Kyle on FootballThe 'Dawgs, the Sport, and the Rest of Life
About this Entry
Posted by: tkyleking

Original: 1/31/2006 12:02 AM
Views: 798
Comments: 5
eProps: 2

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
lsusanoooo


Tuesday, January 31, 2006

 
I recently expressed my hope that the drive to schedule a home and home series between Georgia and Michigan was beginning to pick up steam
 
A recent comment by Johnny of Ronald Bellamy's Underachieving All-Stars offers some evidence that this hope is not in vain.  Westsider Rider's Kenny likewise has joined the ranks of Michigan webloggers supporting my proposal.  Actually, Kenny was on board a while ago, but I just flat missed itMea culpa and much obliged. 
 
Closer to home, Braves and Birds' Michael also likes the idea and he has provided a nice summary of the S.E.C.'s recent league-wide out-of-conference schedule upgrade, which certainly bodes well for what I have suggested
 
Ere I press ahead with my arguments in favor of a football series between the Bulldogs and the Wolverines, though, I would like to direct everyone's attention to Paulwesterdawg's Georgia Sports Blog, which features a new look, reveals that both Paulwesterdawg and Hey Jenny Slater's Doug Gillett are red-green color blind, and sparks an interesting discussion of the ten most pivotal moments in University of Georgia athletic history.  As always, Paulwesterdawg's work is worth a look. 
 
 
In the interim, however, I would like to pick up where I left off yesterday, when I was addressing L.D.'s quite persuasive explanation of why S.E.C. squads seldom schedule away games against teams from other regions
 
In particular, L.D. noted that some teams' options are more restricted than others'.  For instance, Auburn now plays Alabama in Bryant-Denny and Jordan-Hare Stadiums rather than at Legion Field and Tennessee plays a great many games in its home state and seldom loses to its local rival (Vanderbilt), so the Plainsmen and the Volunteers have been able to schedule out-of-conference teams from other regions more freely than Georgia and Florida. 
 
The Bulldogs and the Gators, of course, are limited by their neutral site series with one another in Jacksonville and by the fact that both Georgia and Florida play season-ending home and home series against tough in-state rivals in non-conference contests.  Since major college teams have to play six home games per year for budgetary reasons, the Red and Black have difficulty scheduling non-conference road games in odd-numbered years (when the 'Dawgs play Georgia Tech in Atlanta) and the Orange and Blue have trouble scheduling non-conference road games in even-numbered years (when the Gators play Florida State in Tallahassee). 
 
As L.D. acknowledges, these problems are ameliorated somewhat by the advent of the 12-game regular season schedule.  When a twelfth regular season game was added on a temporary basis in 2002 and 2003, Georgia and Florida each used the extra contest to renew a dormant regional rivalry.  Now that the twelfth game is being made permanent, though, options exist for branching out periodically. 
 
Florida's scheduling restrictions closely approximate Georgia's.  Texas's circumstances mirror Georgia's in one important respect---the Longhorns play an annual neutral site game against Oklahoma in Dallas---but U.T.'s season-ending in-state rivalry with Texas A&M is not only a conference game, it's within the division.  Likewise, South Carolina's situation somewhat parallels Georgia's, insofar as the Gamecocks end their season with an in-state rivalry game against an out-of-conference opponent (Clemson), but the Palmetto State Poultry do not play any regularly scheduled neutral site contests. 
 
Since the Gators and the Bulldogs find themselves in similar situations, a look at Florida's out-of-conference scheduling might prove useful, as it gives us some idea of what a team with virtually the same limitations has been able to do where its non-conference slate is concerned.  I will begin this analysis with the year 1965, for three reasons. 
 
First of all, 1965 was the year Georgia played its last regular season road game against an opponent from outside the South, so a look at Florida's non-conference scheduling from 1965 to the present day will give us an idea of what the Gators have been doing during the period in which the 'Dawgs have been playing exclusively within the region. 
 
Secondly, 1965 was the season after Georgia Tech's first season as a football independent.  The Bulldogs and the Yellow Jackets were members of the same league from 1921 until 1963---first in the Southern Conference, then in the Southeastern Conference---but the Ramblin' Wreck left the S.E.C. starting in 1964. 
 
1965 was the first season in which certain non-conference games had to be designated as S.E.C. contests in order to make up for the Golden Tornado's departure.  It was at that point that Georgia's and Florida's situations truly became analogous, inasmuch as it was not until then that the Red and Black had to contend both with an annual neutral site contest and with an in-state rivalry game against a non-conference opponent. 
 
Finally, 1965 arguably is the year that the Florida-Florida State series truly took on the intensity of a battle for local bragging rights.  F.S.U.'s student body was all-female until 1947 and the Gator faithful never let the 'Noles forget it. 
 
The two schools did not meet on the gridiron until 1958 and the first six series meetings all took place in Gainesville.  The Gators were 5-0-1 in those contests.  Small wonder, then, that Florida fans considered their major Sunshine State rival to be the Hurricanes, who were the Gators' season-ending opponent every year from 1953 to 1962. 
 
It was not until 1964 that the Florida-Florida State game came to Tallahassee . . . and it was not until that year that the Seminoles beat the Orange and Blue, who (as chronicled by Cale Conley in his book Sunshine Hate) took the field against F.S.U. wearing jerseys with the words "Go For Seven" embroidered across the front.  After that, the previously one-sided series took on a whole new intensity. 
 
Accordingly, 1965 seems like a good starting point for comparing apples to apples where Georgia's and Florida's out-of-conference scheduling is concerned . . . and, straight out of the gate, we find support for my position that it is possible for an S.E.C. team in the Bulldogs' situation to take on a Big Ten team on the road. 
 
On September 18, 1965, the Gators opened their season against Northwestern in Evanston.  The Wildcats returned the game on September 17, 1966, when Northwestern lost to the Orange and Blue in Gainesville in the opening game of Steve Spurrier's Heisman Trophy-winning senior season. 
 
Despite that auspicious beginning, the Gators have not followed through by regularly scheduling non-conference road games against teams from outside the South.  Nevertheless, Florida has done a better job of this than Georgia has done.  In addition to the home and home series with Northwestern in 1965 and 1966, the Big Lizards exchanged games with Southern Cal, playing at Gainesville in 1982 and at Los Angeles in 1983, and with Rutgers, playing at Gainesville in 1985 and at East Rutherford in 1986. 
 
Don't laugh about Florida's series with the Scarlet Knights; in 1985, the Gators went 9-1-1.  U.F.'s lone loss was to Georgia . . . and the tie was with Rutgers, which halted the Orange and Blue's 10-game winning streak.  Florida, after hosting Syracuse in The Swamp in 1984, also traveled to the Carrier Dome in 1991; the Gators' loss to the Orangemen on the road was the only blemish on U.F.'s regular season record in what was to be the Big Lizards' first official S.E.C. championship season. 
 
While Florida has made few trips outside the South since Steve Spurrier's playing days in Gainesville, the Gators have journeyed to California, Illinois, New Jersey, and New York while facing scheduling challenges virtually identical to the Bulldogs' . . . and the Orange and Blue have done so despite being located 339 miles to the south of Athens. 
 
I noted previously that I believed Michigan would be willing to schedule Georgia because Ohio State had scheduled Texas and I could not imagine that the Wolverines would allow themselves to be outdone by the Buckeyes.  By the same token, it is inconceivable to me that any self-respecting Bulldog fan would be willing to permit the Gators to get a leg up on the Red and Black by playing a superior schedule. 
 
Doubtless there will be those who are quick to point out that Georgia's and Florida's circumstances are not quite as similar as I have suggested.  While it is true that both the Bulldogs and the Gators have to contend with an annual neutral site game and a season-ending in-state showdown against a non-conference rival, the Red and Black have faced two significant perennial foes from outside the S.E.C.:  Georgia Tech and Clemson. 
 
This point is a fair one.  In addition to closing out the regular season against the Yellow Jackets each autumn, the 'Dawgs also routinely faced the Tigers during the period being described.  From 1965 to 1987, Georgia and Clemson met 21 times in 23 seasons.  However, the Gators were in much the same boat during that span; U.F. took on the 'Canes every year from 1938 to 1987.  In 2002 and 2003, when the Bulldogs renewed their series with the Tigers, the Big Lizards renewed their series with Miami. 
 
Between 1965 and 2005, there were 27 Georgia-Clemson games and 27 Florida-Miami games.  Between 1965 and 2005, Georgia played Georgia Tech every year and Florida played Florida State every year.  Between 1965 and 2005, Georgia and Florida faced one another in Athens once, in Gainesville once, and in Jacksonville 39 times.  The situations aren't analogous; they're absolutely identical. 
 
Florida faced exactly the same scheduling challenges as Georgia, yet, despite having even farther to travel to play road games outside the region, the Gators managed four cross-sectional home and home series during a four-decade span.  Meanwhile, the 'Dawgs haven't traveled outside the South for a regular season game in 40 years, three months, and 29 days . . . and counting.  If the Orange and Blue can do it, why can't the Red and Black? 
 
If you're still not convinced, though, consider the possibility that (as Billy Joel put it in quite a different context), sooner or later, it comes down to fate.  Might it be that a Georgia-Michigan series simply is meant to be?  My former "Dawg Show" co-host, Travis Rice, claims this is the case. 
 
Trav very well may be the only college football fan in America who likes the Big & Rich "College GameDay" theme song, "Comin' to Your City."  Recently, Trav sent me an e-mail in which he asserted that Big & Rich had foretold a Georgia-Michigan series "in a manner similar to a Roman Oracle." 
 
Trav quotes the opening stanza of the song as follows (with, as we say in the legal profession, emphasis added):  "Well, we flew through Oklahoma, Alabama, and through Georgia trying to get on down to Florida for the game.  And then we loaded up our tailgate, joined a convoy on the freeway headed north to see them Buckeyes and Notre Dame.  Victory for U.S.C., Bulldogs barking at the Wolverines.  Hook 'em, 'Horns, and gimme that Rocky Top Tennessee. . . ." 
 
I can't say that I know much about Big & Rich, but I'd be willing to bet that neither Big nor Rich is old enough to remember the last time Georgia played Michigan, so why does the theme song of college football's most prominent and influential pregame show include the incongruous combination of the Georgia Bulldogs barking at the Michigan Wolverines? 
 
Trav has an answer for that question, too.  As he put it, "Not only do we want this game to happen, but Big & Rich, Cowboy Troy, E.S.P.N., the A.B.C. Capital Cities Network, the Walt Disney Corporation, Tinkerbell, Roy Disney, Mickey Mouse, all seven Dwarves, Lilo & Stich, the TomorrowLand Transit Authority, the cast members of Broadway's smash hit 'The Lion King,' the Miramax Division, the janitors at EuroDisney, and the pulse of consciousness that still emanates from Walt's frozen head . . . all want to see this game happen." 
 
Without putting too fine a point on the matter, the college football blogosphere is not exactly swarming with aficionados of E.S.P.N.'s college football coverage.  Nevertheless, when Travis Rice, with whom I co-hosted a show about Georgia Bulldog football on local cable access for six years, perceives the hand of Fate (or, at least, of the Worldwide Leader in Sports, which may be the same thing, whether we like it or not) in an idea of mine, I am not one to argue with him. 
 
Destiny.  History.  Every Bulldog fan's deep-seated desire not to be outdone by the hated Gators.  All of these are reasons for Georgia to schedule a home and home series with Michigan.  If that isn't enough to convince you, then you simply are impervious to evidence. 
 
Go 'Dawgs! 
 Posted 1/31/2006 12:02 AM - 798 Views - 2 eProps - 5 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

5 Comments

Visit grandypeace's Xanga Site!
I'd love to see one personally, and I'm totally on board with the fate thing. For the record, yesterday (or a few days ago?) you listed Braves & Birds as someone who'd be backing the Bulldogs in such a contest. However, he's actually a Michigan graduate and a Maize & Blue fan first and foremost. So he'd be pulling for the other guys. He roots for the Bulldogs (and I for michigan - we signed a blood pact under a gibbous moon on the ides of October, in the waining period of the last millenium), but he's a Michigan guy.

So far, I'm pleased with Evans' tenure. However, I do have one concern. While he has taken steps to upgrade the OOC and get us out of the region, he recently put Western Kentucky and Appalacian State on the schedule, 2 1-AA schools. GSU I can handle playing every now and again. I don't see the need to put any other 1AA schools on there though. Now, App State was champion last year or the year before IIRC, and is probably a better opponent than someone like Arkansas State. Still, I'd prefer to keep it to GSU every 4 or 5 years and that's it. I was a bit puzzled by this recent move, to say the least. Western Kentucky is a seventh home game for us next year. Maybe that was why we grabbed them, we really wanted to play 7 at home. *shrugs*

Oh, and I've heard tell that we're seeking a solid opponent for the opener in 2007. We've already got 6 home games on the slate that year if I recall correctly. Hopefully there will be years where 6 home games is enough.
Posted 1/31/2006 8:45 AM by grandypeace - recommend - reply

Visit tkyleking's Xanga Site!
I appreciate the clarification, Grandypeace. Although I was clear on Michael's loyalties, I failed to describe them in detail in my recent postings, so you were right to bring it to everyone's attention, lest there be any confusion.

Despite the fact that we are both attorneys who practice in the metropolitan Atlanta area, I don't know Michael, but it is my understanding that he went to the University of Michigan as an undergraduate, went to the University of Virginia for law school, and practices in Georgia. His site name ("Braves and Birds") suggests support for the Atlanta professional sports teams and his team affiliation on the BlogPoll voter roll at MGoBlog is listed as Georgia. I certainly understand that his first loyalty is to the Wolverines, though; in fact, I know several people who went to one university for an undergraduate degree and to another university for a graduate or professional degree, and, without fail, they all root for their undergraduate institutions first and foremost.

If anything, though, fellows like Michael are a good example of why I want Georgia and Michigan to play one another. While I will be rooting hard for the 'Dawgs if such a series ever comes to pass, I have a great deal of respect for the U.M. program and the Wolverine fans; I fully expect that, after the game, I would be able to shake hands with the nearest Michigan fan, say "Good game," and have the gesture returned in kind . . . regardless of which team won or lost.

I hold Michigan in high regard and I have every confidence that a series between the Bulldogs and the Wolverines would be impassioned without being acrimonious. In short, I believe it would be college football at its finest, both on and off the field, complete with pageantry, sportsmanship, and first-rate football.

I share your estimation of Damon Evans's non-conference scheduling, which generally has been quite good but which has been marred somewhat by the addition of Division I-AA schools. I understand why Georgia occasionally schedules Georgia Southern (although I wish the Red and Black wouldn't schedule the Eagles) and I even understand why the 'Dawgs will be playing the Hilltoppers, since Georgia snared Dennis Felton from W.K.U. Scheduling Appalachian State is a pure Auburn/Kansas State/Texas Tech move, though, and there is no excuse for it.

Given the realities of college football as a business in the 21st century, though, it may be that lower-tier games are the price we have to pay for scheduling upgrades. Being realistic about it, the best practical option may be for Georgia to schedule in six-year increments, using the extra early season game in the following manner: in years one and two, schedule a home and home with an historic power that is not a traditional Georgia rival, preferably outside the region (e.g., Michigan, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Penn State, Southern Cal, or Texas); in years three and four, schedule home games against Sun Belt or Conference U.S.A. squads that won't require the 'Dawgs to return the game; in years five and six, schedule a home and home with Clemson; repeat. In a perfect world, we would never play Division I-AA or lower-tier Division I-A teams, but that may be the best realistic option.

Finally, I'm looking forward to the upcoming announcement about the 2007 season opener. Paulwesterdawg quoted some good information about the teams that are available on that date and some quality options exist. We shall see. . . .

Thanks for reading and thanks for writing, Grandypeace. Go 'Dawgs!
Posted 1/31/2006 12:15 PM by tkyleking - recommend - reply

Visit lsusanoooo's Xanga Site!
Cheap louis vuitton uk wholesale offers a variety of options to satisfy your needs. Some new ones even has fashionable styles fold over flap to disguise the snap closure and a draw string is added for a convenient closure.Women bags are definitely of those things that women can't stay away from beside from shoes,dresses accessories, jewelries, and modern gadgets. If you are a woman then you should know that the reason why women have lots of bags on louis vuitton online shop.
Posted 4/9/2012 4:55 AM by lsusanoooo - recommend - reply

Visit lsusanoooo's Xanga Site!
You might have seen plenty of greatest quality bags into your entire life span but when it comes to the coach outlet store online they are remarkably efficient, versatile and carved bags beyond your imaginations.coach outlet store is known by many people. It provides many new fashionable Coach goods that are surely suitable for you.To meet people's need, coach outlet online supply all sort of cheap coach wallets and bags. the pattern is very innovation. you can buy it as a gift to your best friend.
Posted 4/9/2012 4:56 AM by lsusanoooo - recommend - reply

Visit lsusanoooo's Xanga Site!
Looking for a louis vuitton outlet and don't know where they are? The easiest way is to enter here. That simple and you definitely will never be disappointed.Louis Vuitton backpack are usually more expensive when compared with ordinary Lv handbags, so that it is tough designed for at this time budget-conscious buyers to purchase louis vuitton outlet online them all. Plenty of trusted online retailers have been stocking Kirby G3, G4, G5 as well as G6 vacum carriers during the entire very same louis vuitton outlet store shop. Providers of such identical target the favourite companies, one example is Prada, Lv, Chanel, or anything else, these kind of bags are usually pretty much all around you. It indicates cost is very that you simply manage to game exceptional new look for just about any function you’ve thought out. While you are attempting to locate a developer ladies handbag, it is advisable to buy one which will go for virtually my way through ones wardrobe. Perhaps while in the regulation time, level of comfort prefer to put on fresh new red-colored tinted lip gloss to find a superb mindset.louis vuitton handbags outlet store online The environment is usually a massive site with numerous prefer to allow and also interestingly you could louis vuitton create it for a person who will be certainly not considered.
Posted 4/9/2012 4:58 AM by lsusanoooo - recommend - reply


Sign in to CommentChoose Identity
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)

(?)

Back to tkyleking's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in tkyleking's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)